Even if that is proven, ERISA limits damages… [ensuring] the HMO will not be punished" in a substantive fashion (ERISA, 2004, HARP).
However, some state courts, despite ERISA have held HMOs directly liable for negligent treatment of their members, such as when an HMO refused to grant a patient the 30 days of inpatient psychiatric care his doctor said he required and only covered 10 days. The California court "ruled that an organization, such as the patient's HMO, that substantially shaped the course of patient care could be held liable for the quality of the care actually delivered… a Pennsylvania court also held that an HMO could be held liable for injuries to its members as a result of its hiring incompetent physicians" (HMO malpractice, 2009, Mega Justice). In these instances, the HMO was held directly responsible for denying coverage or the actions of member physicians.
Some have also suggested that being able to sue HMOs under the concept of enterprise liability would be helpful in curtailing costs: "Under the enterprise liability theory, responsibility and liability for medical malpractice shifts from the individual physician to the health maintenance organization (HMO) and effectively provides immunity to individual physicians from medical malpractice actions"(Leone 1993). These would consolidate lawsuits against physicians and also hold HMOs accountable for their action as the ostensible or de facto agency making the decisions for a patient's healthcare. While greater liability would act as an incentive for HMOs...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now